Re: I18n comment: rfc3066 or successor

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 wrote:
> Comment: "as described in RFC 3066 ([RFC3066])"
> Recommend 'as described in RFC 3066 ([RFC3066]) or its successor'.

The working group discussed this.

We have made this change.

Note that this is just an informative reference, and therefore it really 
makes no difference either way to the normative requirements of our draft.

If this does not satisfy you, please let us know.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 17:57:16 UTC