Re: I18n comment: rfc3066 or successor from Martin Duerst on 2006-01-23 (public-i18n-core@w3.org from January to March 2006)

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:00:05 +0900
To: ishida@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20060123175938.02eb5a80@localhost>

At 19:42 06/01/21, ishida@w3.org wrote:
 >
 >Comment from the i18n review of:
 >http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/
 >
 >Comment 8
 >At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
 >Editorial/substantive: S
 >Location in reviewed document:
 >Sec. 6.3.1
 >[http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#attribute-representation]
 >
 >Comment:
 >"as described in RFC 3066 ([RFC3066])"
 >
 >
 >Recommend 'as described in RFC 3066 ([RFC3066]) or its successor'.
 >
 >
 >Note that its successor is currently only awaiting the IETF editor to
 >assign an RFC number, but has been approved by the IETF to succeed RFC3066.
 >Note also that it will allow for additional subcode values, such as script
 >identifiers.

Just one small correction: "IETF editor" -> "RFC Editor".

Regards,    Martin.

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 00:43:18 UTC