- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:38:49 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:37:39 +0900, <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/ > > Comment 6 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Location in reviewed document: > Sec. 6.1.1 > [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#typenmsp] > > Comment: > In 6.1.1, it should be made clear that the styling language (e.g. CSS) > must provide a prefix binding mechanism. It is also unclear what effect, > if any, namespace declarations in the document being styled have on > prefixes used in the stylesheet. > > > >> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] >> Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22 > >> Regarding #6, I'm a bit lost here, the draft notes precisely >> this three times already and points out, three times, where >> additional information can be found at some point. What's the >> problem here exactly? > > > >> From: Daniel Glazman >> [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com] >> Sent: 20 January 2006 16:00 > >> #6 "A type selector containing a namespace prefix that has >> not been previously >> declared is an invalid selector. The mechanism for >> declaring a namespace >> prefix is left up to the language implementing >> Selectors. In CSS, such a >> mechanism is defined in the General Syntax module." > > I don't understand you. Your reply to comment #3 asks "what is CSS specific about the document?", and your reply here refers only to a syntax module *for CSS*. Maybe this is a general problem. A previous version was called "css selectors" ( http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-selectors-20010126/ ), and your terminology in the document is sometimes inconsistent: mostly you talk of selectors, but sometimes about css selectors (sec. 11), or w3c selectors (sec. 12).
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 14:38:58 UTC