Re: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:32:11 +0900, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>  
wrote:

>
> The WG had a hard time understanding your comment 3:
>
> "It would be good if you could mention that although xs:anyURI allows
> for IRIs (see LC74a), the mapping from IRI to URI in xs:anyURI is
> currently not defined in terms of IRI. This comment relates also for
> example to the reference of xs:anyURI in sec. 2.1.2.1 and sec. 3.1.2.1,
> and to the Adjuncts specification."
>
> Can you provide us with more background, or perhaps precise wording for
> what you'd like to see?


Sorry for being unclear. The problem is as follows, and this is also a  
proposal for some text which you might integrate as a note in WSDL 2.0:

xs:anyURI defines a mapping from xs:anyURI values to URIs via an URI  
reference escaping procedure. In the current version of XML Schema 2, this  
procedure is defined in terms of XLink 1.0, and does not reply on the  
escaping procedure from RFC 3987 (IRI, sec. 3.1). Hence, relying on  
xs:anyURI might generate escaped URIs which are different from IRI based  
escaped URIs.

Is that o.k. with you?

Best regards,

Felix

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix
> Sasaki
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 8:54 PM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from
> the i18n core wg
>
>
> Dear Web Services Description Working Group,
>
> With this mail I am sending you i18n comments [1] on the WSDL 2.0 WDs
> (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding). Since I am rather late (please
> accept
> my appologies), there was no time to get endorsement from the i18n core
>
> wg. So please regard these comments currently as my personal comments.
>
> I am looking forward for you feedback. Best regards,
>
> Felix Sasaki (team contact of the i18n core wg)
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/International/2005/10/wsdl20-review.html
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 03:41:55 UTC