- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:32:11 -0700
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
The WG had a hard time understanding your comment 3: "It would be good if you could mention that although xs:anyURI allows for IRIs (see LC74a), the mapping from IRI to URI in xs:anyURI is currently not defined in terms of IRI. This comment relates also for example to the reference of xs:anyURI in sec. 2.1.2.1 and sec. 3.1.2.1, and to the Adjuncts specification." Can you provide us with more background, or perhaps precise wording for what you'd like to see? -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 8:54 PM To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org Subject: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg Dear Web Services Description Working Group, With this mail I am sending you i18n comments [1] on the WSDL 2.0 WDs (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding). Since I am rather late (please accept my appologies), there was no time to get endorsement from the i18n core wg. So please regard these comments currently as my personal comments. I am looking forward for you feedback. Best regards, Felix Sasaki (team contact of the i18n core wg) [1] http://www.w3.org/International/2005/10/wsdl20-review.html
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2005 21:32:41 UTC