- From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:04:32 -0700
- To: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>
- CC: Addison Phillips <addison.phillips@quest.com>, ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>, w3c-xsl-query@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
That's not my point. The text says "a logical event divorced from a particular location on the Earth". The wording is too strong, since my birthday is *directly* dependent on the particular location where I was born; had I been born at exactly the same point in time in Tokyo, my birthday would have been the 14th. So the terminology "divorced from" is completely wrong. I think that it can be reworded to make the point that you are trying to, but it has to be reworded. Mark Jim Melton wrote: > Mark, > > First, a slightly belated happy birthday! > > Not to put too fine a point on it, but 19:32 on September 13 (anywhere > in the USA, but I don't know the time zone in which you were born) is > either 10:32, 11:32, 12:32, or 13:32 on September 14 in Tokyo. I doubt > that, if you happened to be in Tokyo this week, that you would celebrate > your birthday on September 14, even though that would allow you to do so > at exactly n years from your astronomical birth time. You're pretty > likely, statistically speaking, to celebrate your birthday in Tokyo on > 13 September, just as you would do if you were in San Jose, Denver, or > New York. No? > > Hope this helps! > Jim > > At 9/13/2005 11:54 AM, Mark Davis wrote: > >> Note: someone in IBM objected to the statement: >> >> > One application for this type of representation is for values that >> are time zone independent, representing a logical event divorced from >> a particular location on the Earth. For example, a person's birth date >> is independent of time zone. >> >> He has a certain point. My birth date is not really disconnected, >> since it is based on the time zone where I was born. For example, I >> was born at 7:32 PT on Sept 13 (and for those who like puzzles, my age >> today in hex is the transposition of my name in decimal). >> >> Should we use a different example or slightly different wording? >> >> Mark >> >> Addison Phillips wrote: >> >>> Dear Ashok, >>> Thanks for this update and the changes, which look fine. We took an >>> action in our meeting today to reduce the Wiki to Note format and >>> request publication as a Note ASAP. You should see the first >>> transition request next week. >>> Addison >>> Addison P. Phillips >>> Globalization Architect, Quest Software >>> Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group >>> Internationalization is not a feature. >>> It is an architecture. >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:44 AM >>>> To: Addison Phillips; Paul Cotton >>>> Cc: w3c-xsl-query@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org >>>> Subject: RE: ACTION A-Redmond05-01: timezone health warning >>>> >>>> The XML Query and the XSL WGs decided that the text on the Wiki page >>>> was acceptable for publication as a note as long as a couple of changes >>>> were made. I have made the changes. >>>> >>>> Can you publish the material as a note? Please inform us when that is >>>> done >>>> and we will add the appropriate reference from the F&O. >>>> >>>> All the best, Ashok >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison.phillips@quest.com] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:49 AM >>>>> To: Paul Cotton; ashok.malhotra@oracle.com >>>>> Cc: w3c-xsl-query@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org >>>>> Subject: RE: ACTION A-Redmond05-01: timezone health warning >>>>> >>>>> Hi Paul, >>>>> >>>>> I had an action item to follow up this week with Ashok. I >>>>> believe we are done with our editing homework. The question >>>>> is what form the health warning should take in your document. >>>>> Our text is slightly long. >>>>> >>>>> We want to suggest that we publish our document as a Note and >>>>> that you include a reference to it in your document. >>>>> >>>>> The document itself is currently located in the Wiki: >>>>> >>>>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/i18nFAQTimeZone#preview >>>>> >>>>> Please let us know if you have particular concerns with the >>>>> content or if you prefer a different course of action for >>>>> including material from it in yours. >>>>> >>>>> Addison >>>>> >>>>> Addison P. Phillips >>>>> Globalization Architect, Quest Software >>>>> Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group >>>>> >>>>> Internationalization is not a feature. >>>>> It is an architecture. >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com] >>>>>> Sent: 2005?8?31? 20:55 >>>>>> To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; Addison Phillips >>>>>> Cc: w3c-xsl-query@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: ACTION A-Redmond05-01: timezone health warning >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> ACTION A-Redmond05-01 Ashok will work with Addison to >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> develop text >>>>> >>>>>>> for the timezone health warning. ETA end of August. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is the text for the health warning ready? If it is can one of you >>>>>> please reply to this message with the proposed text or a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> pointer to it? >>>>> >>>>>> /paulc >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada >>>>>> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 >>>>>> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ======================================================================== > Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144 > Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345 > Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com > 1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org > Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name > ======================================================================== > = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions = > = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = > = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = > ======================================================================== > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 17:04:50 UTC