- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:00:02 -0000
- To: 'François Yergeau' <francois@yergeau.com>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "'i18n IG'" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Francois said: > Comment 9: this says "...has implications for XML > Modularization spec..." I suppose this should *XHTML*, not XML. Fixed. > > Comment 35: we discussed this last time and were OK with the > double duty hreflang now does. I think this comment should > be deleted. I didn't come away with that understanding. I remember, it was very difficult to hear you during that call for some reason. Let's discuss again, although it would also be good to get clarity from HTML folks whether it is intended to go one way or the other or both. My impression from talking with Steven is that they intend it only to be used for HTTP purposes, and I suspect the document is just badly written. > > Comment 42: there is a leftover editor's note. Fixed. >
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:00:03 UTC