- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:20:24 -0500
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org, i18n IG <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Comment 9: this says "...has implications for XML Modularization spec..." I suppose this should *XHTML*, not XML. Comment 35: we discussed this last time and were OK with the double duty hreflang now does. I think this comment should be deleted. Comment 42: there is a leftover editor's note. Richard Ishida a écrit : > I have updated the table of review comments at > > http://www.w3.org/International/2004/10/xhtml2-i18n-review.html > > Please check the text and tell me whether I can send to the HTML group. > > You should check, in particular, comments 38a to the end plus any other comments with a number followed by a,b or c. > > Also: When I spoke with Steven Pemberton a few days ago, he said why don't we request that xml:lang be mandatory on the html tag. Perhaps we could discuss this at the next meeting. Of course, the sticking point would be where you have a mulilingual document. However, may be better to think of an appropriate value for such documents rather than simply abandon the possibility of solving once and for all the problem of people not marking up documents with language information. > > RI > > > > > ============ > Richard Ishida > W3C > > contact info: > http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ > > W3C Internationalization: > http://www.w3.org/International/ > > Publication blog: > http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 15:21:13 UTC