Re: [jlreq] Digital native version of JLReq, discuss goals and changes from the current version (#281)

Thank you @macnmm for your insights.

As for the point 1, can we expect most web browsers to switch to the embox model? It would depend on the amount of work required for the implementation, and the extent of the issue when it was not implemented. In JLreq I believe we should also explain best practices with Latin baseline also, and explain what drawbacks it has. It would be super if you could write it up, as I myself do not have enough understanding of the issue.

Could you elaborate on the point 2? as you mentioned a diagram would greatly help.

I completely agree with your point 3 & 4. Could you make a separate GH issue to start developing new rules? what are points to be discussed?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kidayasuo
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/281#issuecomment-893916436 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 6 August 2021 00:34:48 UTC