Re: [jlreq] Digital native version of JLReq, discuss goals and changes from the current version (#281)

> Thank you @macnmm for your insights.
> 
> As for the point 1, can we expect most web browsers, email, memo applications, etc. to switch to the embox model? It would depend on the amount of work required, and the extent of the issue when it was not implemented. In JLreq I believe we should explain best practices with Latin baseline model, and explain what drawbacks it has. It would explain why one might want to implement the embox model. It would be super if you could write it up. I am very looking forward to learning it as I myself do not have enough understanding of the issue.
> 
> Could you elaborate on the point 2? As you mentioned a diagram would greatly help.
> 
> I completely agree with your point 3 & 4. Could you make a separate GH issue to start developing new rules? what are points to be discussed?

Added [#296](https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/296)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by macnmm
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/281#issuecomment-903193706 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 22 August 2021 00:33:03 UTC