- From: Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:00:26 +0100
- To: "Ruben Verborgh (UGent-imec)" <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>, "Miel Vander Sande (UGent-imec)" <Miel.VanderSande@ugent.be>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
>> Regardless of the Hydra vs TPF/LDF discussion, some of those issues have been sitting there for years on end. It is common in all kinds of software communities to cut off the long tail of potentially abandoned topics. >Perfectly agree, but then they need to be closed on grounds of abandonment, >not on grounds of irrelevance. Well, maybe `obsolete` is not the perfect word, but still - it has an `out of date` meaning. Maybe abandoned would be better, but we agreed on the call to label those that way so we can easily find them in future (just in case). You can also read the description of the `obsolete` label on GitHub - its fully related to closed issues agreed on the first call this year. Irrelevance was not the driver of such an action. Karol pon., 14 sty 2019 o 19:53 Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > >I can be there from 8:15pm CET onward; > >I’d appreciate if you could postpone the topic until my late arrival (for which I apologize). > > Sure thing - there are three more topics on the agenda - I believe we > can postpone that one until your arrival. > > Karol > > pon., 14 sty 2019 o 19:36 Ruben Verborgh (UGent-imec) > <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be> napisał(a): > > > > > The symptom of this close relation however is that I got the impression on multiple occasions in the past that you are shaping Hydra Core specifically for LDF/TPF. > > > > Is there one example for this? > > It has never been our intention. > > > > > Regardless of the Hydra vs TPF/LDF discussion, some of those issues have been sitting there for years on end. It is common in all kinds of software communities to cut off the long tail of potentially abandoned topics. > > > > Perfectly agree, but then they need to be closed on grounds of abandonment, > > not on grounds of irrelevance. > > > > >> I think it’s very important to distinguish between Hydra and Hydra Core, > > >> as we did in the past. > > > > > > Interesting point, because personally I don’t feel like Hydra vs Hydra Core distinction is that clear. More synonymical to be honest. And it has to be very clear, especially to newcomers. > > > > Definitely. > > > > Ruben
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 19:00:55 UTC