- From: Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:53:27 +0100
- To: "Ruben Verborgh (UGent-imec)" <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>, "Miel Vander Sande (UGent-imec)" <Miel.VanderSande@ugent.be>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
>I can be there from 8:15pm CET onward; >I’d appreciate if you could postpone the topic until my late arrival (for which I apologize). Sure thing - there are three more topics on the agenda - I believe we can postpone that one until your arrival. Karol pon., 14 sty 2019 o 19:36 Ruben Verborgh (UGent-imec) <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be> napisał(a): > > > The symptom of this close relation however is that I got the impression on multiple occasions in the past that you are shaping Hydra Core specifically for LDF/TPF. > > Is there one example for this? > It has never been our intention. > > > Regardless of the Hydra vs TPF/LDF discussion, some of those issues have been sitting there for years on end. It is common in all kinds of software communities to cut off the long tail of potentially abandoned topics. > > Perfectly agree, but then they need to be closed on grounds of abandonment, > not on grounds of irrelevance. > > >> I think it’s very important to distinguish between Hydra and Hydra Core, > >> as we did in the past. > > > > Interesting point, because personally I don’t feel like Hydra vs Hydra Core distinction is that clear. More synonymical to be honest. And it has to be very clear, especially to newcomers. > > Definitely. > > Ruben
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 18:53:55 UTC