Re: The survey results are in and they look great

• From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
• Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:58:34 -0700
• To: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
• Cc: "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <C5AEDF7C-9BEB-445B-8B33-4525FF5167D4@ugent.be>

> I think that a Hydra client should be aware of RDF anyway.

If you use JSON-LD as a content type,
which is a great idea for JavaScript anyways,
there are two ways to look at it:
– treat the JSON-LD as JSON (no triples)
– treat the JSON-LD as RDF (triples)
(In the first case, you might need JSON-LD framing.)

So yes, even as an RDF fan myself,
I'd suggest that we should also look at the non-RDF route.
The most interesting libraries, however,
can actually offer both views: RDF (only) when you want it.

Ruben

PS My implementations have been RDF-based so far;
this is because I consider other content types than JSON-LD.

Received on Thursday, 16 June 2016 18:59:09 UTC