RE: Pluralize plurals

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:36 PM, Karol Szczepański wrote:
> I’d stick to the meaning in terms of RDF as well. Going this way we’d
> end up with all prulars as there is nothing that prevents me from
> adding yet another statement in RDF with same subject and predicate.

Yep. We should keep the data model in mind. Properties are the labels on arcs connecting two nodes.

    [A]----[  property ]----->[B]


> As for languages, let’s them poke with using it in their own ways.
> JavaScript will have it’s JSON-LD with contexts where every developer
> can frame the data the way they’d like to have,

Exactly, JSON-LD makes it trivial for developers to frame/re-compact the data so that it uses the property names that are most convenient for them. We won't dictate the context that everyone needs to use. We can off a pluralized version of the context down the road if people think that will make the JSON-LD serialization nicer but let's try to first tackle important open issues before we start reopening old discussions.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2015 19:35:35 UTC