- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois.86@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:40:51 +0000
- To: Michael Petychakis <mpetyx@epu.ntua.gr>, Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALsPASW2CKaY53Y-1N6B8ipTMYVpNbkcmcyMfD+i38_8XgVyaA@mail.gmail.com>
One limitation might be that gitter has no zakim-like trackbot http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html Le mer. 30 sept. 2015 à 18:01, Michael Petychakis <mpetyx@epu.ntua.gr> a écrit : > I think that gitter is super important when developing something open > source that has an active community. > I also agree with Markus and Ruben that the mailing list is already > covering most discussion topics, but IRC was there for anyone wanted to ask > something on the fly, and maybe something stupid. > > This is done now by gitter (with a lot more functionality). > So, I will agree with Asbjørn that gitter is indeed a nice alternative to > IRC and maybe to some of the emails. > If it is not active, we can always switch it off. > > Michael. > > > On Sep 30, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no> wrote: > > 2015-09-30 9:29 GMT+02:00 Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>: > >> Personally, I haven't understood the attractiveness of gitter (it's >> probably just me) >> because it requires me to keep a browser tab open all the time. >> With IRC / other protocols, I can choose my client. >> > > While I agree an open protocol like IRC give you more choice in clients, > there's still protocol limits with IRC that are hard to overcome by just > choosing a good client. Often, such clients cost money (like IRCCloud) and > are also web based. One problem with IRC is history, for instance. > > Having the channel reset on every netsplit or server reboot and having to > be logged in to the channel to accumulate the history, is a major > deficiency that is very hard to solve. Also, not having any support for > markup, makes communication very rudimentary, unengaging and more > time-consuming than rich hypermedia-supporting interfaces like Slack and > Gitter. > > Since Hydra already exists on Gitter, the integration provided with > automatic linking and popup views of issues and such make communication > about everything that exists on GitHub much, much easier. No need to click > anything and change application and context to see what something is; a > simple glance within the chat is all that is required. Much more efficient > and user friendly than what is remotely possible in the most advanced IRC > clients. > > And back to the choice of clients, Gitter has native clients for all major > platforms: > > https://gitter.im/apps > > -- > Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no > «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away» > > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2015 16:43:06 UTC