- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:00:05 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
Hi Markus, > Why not simply "the next link SHOULD NOT point to an empty fragment"? Done: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/commit/21a41c2eb51f84fb70956e06f9f6cc5284ef28ae#diff-6729052fc293975f6f653a85f03d88b3R542 >> Can I already use hydra:view? > > Yes. Done: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/commit/c6a27b39f3900879115c4c72581884a9d7394831 >>> Btw. have you considered that "fragment IRI" could be misinterpreted as "IRI fragment"? >> >> Not yet; we should probably talk about "IRI of the fragment". > > Sounds clearer to me. Done: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/commit/29d419277f9433a3687ae42cbb66f1146dd83324 Next steps on my list: – go through the entire specification to simplify where possible (I still quite can't believe that something as simple as TPF requires this much text) – write a test suite that verifies whether a given server implementation complies with the spec (already started; harder than I thought because of the allowed flexibility) Best, Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 11:00:38 UTC