W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > November 2015

Re: request for verification: paging in TPF

From: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:34:44 +0100
Message-ID: <2b4c95be-4361-439c-9711-223d8b8a4e5d@escalon.de>
To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Cc: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

Am 03.11.2015 12:01 schrieb Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>:
> Hi Markus, 
> > Why not simply "the next link SHOULD NOT point to an empty fragment"? 

Is there a reason why the 'next' link would not simply be unavailable when there are no more data, i.e. it would not be present at all? Or is that what the sentence above is meant to say? 

The sentence above may be read as "the next link should not point to an empty fragment, but must point to some other item", leaving open which item that would be. 

Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 20:35:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 3 November 2015 20:35:19 UTC