- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:40:08 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi David, On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:34 PM, David Booth wrote: > On 06/03/2014 02:39 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > You do realize that we have both "operation" and "supportedOperation" > > at the moment, right? "operation" is used to describe what operations > > are supported by that specific resource whereas "supportedOperation" > > allows to describe what operations are supported by all instances of > > the class it is used on (or all values of the property it is used > > on). In that sense, supportedProperties is consistent at it tells you > > what properties that server supports for instances of that class. > > A small naming suggestion: If I'm understanding correctly, both > "operation" and "supportedOperation" describe what operations are > supported, but one describes what operations are supported a specific > instance whereas the other describes what operations are supported by > all instances of the class. If that is the distinction, I would suggest > choosing names that somehow reflect that distinction. Do you have a concrete suggestion that isn't as clunky as operationSupportedByAllInstances (please also note that supportedOperation is also used on properties). -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 20:40:44 UTC