W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > June 2014

RE: Hydra scope

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:40:08 +0200
To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <039301cf8035$2ddca290$8995e7b0$@gmx.net>
Hi David,

On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:34 PM, David Booth wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 02:39 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > You do realize that we have both "operation" and "supportedOperation"
> > at the moment, right? "operation" is used to describe what operations
> > are supported by that specific resource whereas "supportedOperation"
> > allows to describe what operations are supported by all instances of
> > the class it is used on (or all values of the property it is used
> > on). In that sense, supportedProperties is consistent at it tells you
> > what properties that server supports for instances of that class.
> 
> A small naming suggestion: If I'm understanding correctly, both
> "operation" and "supportedOperation" describe what operations are
> supported, but one describes what operations are supported a specific
> instance whereas the other describes what operations are supported by
> all instances of the class.  If that is the distinction, I would suggest
> choosing names that somehow reflect that distinction.

Do you have a concrete suggestion that isn't as clunky as operationSupportedByAllInstances (please also note that supportedOperation is also used on properties).


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 20:40:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:53:59 UTC