- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:15:54 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
+1 On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > > On Jul 16, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> In April [1] I sent out a mail with proposals for many of our open issues. >> We had lots of discussions since then. Today I'm sending out a couple of >> consensus calls for what I believe are rather uncontroversial issues and >> proposals. >> >> There have been discussions to introduce a RetrieveResourceOperation >> (ISSUE-5 [2]) given that we have other predefined operation types. These >> predefined operation types have, however, been a great source of confusion >> (ISSUE-11 [3]). The proposal is thus to *not* introduce >> RetrieveResourceOperation and accordingly to *remove* >> CreateResourceOperation, DeleteResourceOperation, and >> ReplaceResourceOperation. In the examples in the specification, we will >> replace them with their schema.org counterparts if necessary. >> If we decide to do this, we can also close ISSUE-4 [4]. > > +1 > >> This serves as a call for consensus. Before I proceed with marking the issue >> as resolved and implementing the changes in the spec, I would like to ask if >> anyone has any concerns or objections against this proposal. >> >> Please submit your comments by Wednesday, July 23rd. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Markus >> >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Apr/0050.html >> [2] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/5 >> [3] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/11 >> [4] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/4 >> >> >> -- >> Markus Lanthaler >> @markuslanthaler >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 18:17:45 UTC