- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:00:24 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 11 Jul 2014 at 14:06, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > On 07/11/2014 11:52 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > [...] >>> A couple of initial observations: >>> >>> My team and I prefer N3 notation. I understand JSON-LD aligns more >>> with target audience of web developers. Fair call. >> >> There are plans to include Turtle examples in the specification. We just >> haven't found the time yet to make that happen. > > relevant [ISSUE-18] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/18 > i just commented with link to json-ld.org/playground > > maybe having automated conversion everyone could write examples using > preferred syntax and other one will autoconvert. @Markus you know all > the examples by heart, can we get all the JSON-LD in them from Turtle > without need for JSON-LD Framing? i think for example about > recommendation of embedding hydra:manages The first problem is that the examples are just snippets, not completely valid JSON-LD. The second problem is that the comments are often important and that it’s not easy to preserve them when automatically converting to a different syntax. Last but not least, the module you mentioned in the issue doesn’t output “nice” Turtle, it outputs N-Triples (in this case). > in Linked Data Platform 1.0 Primer i see placeholder for switching > JSON-LD/Turtle > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-primer-20140626/#intro-section Yep, the plan is to do something similar in the Hydra specs. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 11:00:54 UTC