Re: Call for consensus on collection design (ISSUE-41) from Ruben Verborgh on 2014-07-04 (public-hydra@w3.org from July 2014)

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:25:57 +0200
To: "McBennett, Pat" <McBennettP@DNB.com>
Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F264B7CA-86C8-4D59-9B54-08D05DAA5E8E@ugent.be>

> Well, I certainly thought Ruben wanted to mint an IRI for the 'manages block' too, but maybe all he wanted was as you state above.

Minting an IRI is not really necessary for me; but any publisher can of course decide to consistently do that.

However, I think what Gregg said on another thread is more important:

> Make it a best practice that a Collection serialization include the hydra:manages block inline, rather than requiring an additional GET

So even if it has its own IRI, it should not be necessary for a client to dereference it.

Ruben

Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 08:26:37 UTC