- From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 3 Jul 2014 21:22:47 +0200
- To: "Ruben Verborgh" <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Ruben Verborgh:
>> A question:
>>
>> What about using
>>
>> "managesProperty": "schema:knows",
>> "managesSubject": "/alice"
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> "manages": {
>> "property": "schema:knows",
>> "subject": "/alice"
>> }
>
> Only the latter has possibilities for easy extension with existing
> properties; the former requires inventing new properties for each
> step.
I am well aware of the importance of extension points. But how important
is this one? Is it worth the additional property and blank nodes (and a
little bit of additional structural complexity)?
> Plus, the "manages" object should be interpreted as a whole;
> only managesProperty / managesSubject isn't meaningful.
The same is true for "property" / "subject".
Cheers,
Andreas
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 19:23:28 UTC