Thursday, 31 January 2019
Wednesday, 30 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Actions with explicit target (#154)
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Vocabulary extensions
- Re: [Specifications] Actions with explicit target (#154)
- Re: [Specifications] Actions with explicit target (#154)
Saturday, 26 January 2019
Friday, 25 January 2019
Thursday, 24 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] expand on @id with `Status`/`Error` response (#180)
- Re: [Specifications] expand on @id with `Status`/`Error` response (#180)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
Wednesday, 23 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] expand on @id with `Status`/`Error` response (#180)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
Tuesday, 22 January 2019
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by lanthaler
- Closed: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Actions with explicit target (#154)
Sunday, 20 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
Saturday, 19 January 2019
Friday, 18 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by RubenVerborgh
- [Specifications] new commits pushed by RubenVerborgh
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
Thursday, 17 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- [Specifications] Hydra logo licensing (#181)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- [Specifications] Pull Request: expand on @id with `Status`/`Error` response
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
Tuesday, 15 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Document how "errors" can be given an identifier and be reused in responses (#39)
- Re: [Specifications] Create Hydra specification from JSON example (#101)
- Re: [Specifications] Add support for allowed literals and allowed individuals (#82)
- Re: [Specifications] Spec document has wrong header level for classes and properties (#78)
Sunday, 13 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Spec document has wrong header level for classes and properties (#78)
- Re: [Specifications] Spec document has wrong header level for classes and properties (#78)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
Saturday, 12 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Add support for allowed literals and allowed individuals (#82)
- Re: [Specifications] Spec document has wrong header level for classes and properties (#78)
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Discuss versioning
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
Friday, 11 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- [Specifications] Make hydra:error compatible with RFC 7807 (#178)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
Thursday, 10 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Restructure spec to talk about application state, resource state, and API as whole (#44)
- Re: [Specifications] Date ranges / intervals for LDF (#56)
- Re: [Specifications] Add domainIncludes/rangeIncludes statements (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Specification change to cover the issue (#174)
- Re: [Specifications] Added some domain predicates (#176)
- Re: [Specifications] Document how "errors" can be given an identifier and be reused in responses (#39)
- Re: [Specifications] Date ranges / intervals for LDF (#56)
Wednesday, 9 January 2019
- Re: [Specifications] Document how "errors" can be given an identifier and be reused in responses (#39)
- Re: [Specifications] Date ranges / intervals for LDF (#56)
- Re: [Specifications] Date ranges / intervals for LDF (#56)
- Re: [Specifications] Reversed SupportedProperty (#40)
- Re: [Specifications] Reversed SupportedProperty (#40)
- Re: [Specifications] Restructure spec to talk about application state, resource state, and API as whole (#44)
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Added an example of Api response -> ApiDocumentation flow
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Added some domain predicates
- Re: [Specifications] Introduce hydra:filter (subPropertyOf hydra:search) (#45)
- Re: [Specifications] Document how "errors" can be given an identifier and be reused in responses (#39)
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Added an additional description that should cover #32
- Re: [Specifications] Should properties and types that only differ in their capitalization be avoided? (#28)
- Closed: [Specifications] Should properties and types that only differ in their capitalization be avoided? (#28)
Tuesday, 8 January 2019
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Specification change to cover the issue
- [Specifications] Pull Request: Specification changes covering the issue
- Re: [Specifications] Start a Hydra gitbook (#147)
- Re: [Specifications] Use W3C HTTP RDF vocabulary (#109)
- Closed: [Specifications] Use W3C HTTP RDF vocabulary (#109)
- Closed: [Specifications] Add picture to LDF/TPF specs (#98)
- Re: [Specifications] Add picture to LDF/TPF specs (#98)
- Closed: [Specifications] Clarify the reuse of the request URL inside of the fragment (#93)
- Re: [Specifications] Clarify the reuse of the request URL inside of the fragment (#93)
- Re: [Specifications] How to suggest dereferenceability? (#91)
- Closed: [Specifications] How to suggest dereferenceability? (#91)
- Closed: [Specifications] Triple pattern fragments: explain how to handle blank nodes (#77)
- Re: [Specifications] Triple pattern fragments: explain how to handle blank nodes (#77)
- Closed: [Specifications] Add support for examples (Operations, IriTemplates, etc.) (#74)
- Re: [Specifications] Add support for examples (Operations, IriTemplates, etc.) (#74)
- Re: [Specifications] Description of workflows (#70)
- Closed: [Specifications] Description of workflows (#70)
- Closed: [Specifications] Create a test suite for servers of triple pattern fragments (#65)
- Re: [Specifications] Create a test suite for servers of triple pattern fragments (#65)
- Re: [Specifications] Date ranges / intervals for LDF (#56)
- Closed: [Specifications] Date ranges / intervals for LDF (#56)
- Re: [Specifications] Improve definition of hydra:search (#51)
- Closed: [Specifications] Improve definition of hydra:search (#51)
- Re: [Specifications] Restructure spec to talk about application state, resource state, and API as whole (#44)
- Closed: [Specifications] Restructure spec to talk about application state, resource state, and API as whole (#44)
- Re: [Specifications] Reversed SupportedProperty (#40)
- Closed: [Specifications] Reversed SupportedProperty (#40)
- Re: [Specifications] Define "priority of constituencies" (#38)
- Closed: [Specifications] Define "priority of constituencies" (#38)
- Re: [Specifications] Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (#31)
- Closed: [Specifications] Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (#31)
- Re: [Specifications] Ideas for additional features/vocabularies (#20)
- Closed: [Specifications] Ideas for additional features/vocabularies (#20)