- From: Erik Wilde via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 04:54:43 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
On 2019-01-12 11:44, Karol SzczepaĆski wrote: > Awesome, @dret <https://github.com/dret> - if you can spare some time on > this, it would be much appreciated. > As for the solution - generic would be better, but if it means separate > lifecycle, repo and so on that could cause discrepancies or other > obstacles, I'd prefer something closer to hydra there may be a misunderstanding here. i am not really all that interested to drive this myself. i'd be happy to help if questions arise relating to the existing spec. but in terms of doing the actual work, that's something that would be up to those who want to have this format. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dret Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/178#issuecomment-453802168 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2019 04:54:44 UTC