- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 11:33:49 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 8 unresolved discussions. --- *[drafts/use-cases/0.intro.md, line 61 at r3](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/154#-L7phzWK_cLAGjwnFap_:-L7sseistfVpE4HKbYpm:b5fhid2) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/fa23516a0e71bf50633726d839217103245d7544/drafts/use-cases/0.intro.md#L61)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, tpluscode (Tomasz Pluskiewicz) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> So we want this to be `"@reverse": "hydra:operation"`? </blockquote></details> Also, I notice that there is a schema:target too. This can be confusing --- *[drafts/use-cases/7.searching-events.md, line 19 at r1](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/154#-L2FHzTqp1okBeqnrpBL:-L7srovyo1KjAXlP_v0f:bfwe4q0) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/aa28c5c639dde02c9aacfaf7f5d7121b0d7caa3b/drafts/use-cases/7.searching-events.md#L19)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, tpluscode (Tomasz Pluskiewicz) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> Actually, I like Markus' suggestion above better. </blockquote></details> Sorry about going back and forth but it occurred to me that maybe the client may be interested in properties of the action (a human description?). Going straight for the operation can be unintuitive --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/154)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/154#issuecomment-373991061 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2018 11:33:51 UTC