- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:24:21 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Isn't that where the action's type comes in? As proposed, schema:DiscoverAction could be a good existing fit. If not we could expand the actions and not keep adding more and more predicates --- Review status: 0 of 2 files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions. --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://beta.reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/158#-:-L7sPDT03CSOxf_psAQH:b7nasy4)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/158#issuecomment-373983813 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2018 09:24:27 UTC