Re: HTML-AAM testing?

Hi Joanie,
really sorry for not responding earlier, i missed the email.

Thanks and YES PLEASE, let me know what needs doing from our end.

Note I will be on vacation august 2nd-30th.

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

On 10 July 2018 at 18:21, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

> + public-html@w3.org
>
> Thanks Joanie, and sorry for this late reply. It's my understanding that
> this testing would be very helpful, but I'll defer to the editors. Steve,
> Alexander, Bogdan, and Scott, can you confirm?
>
> Thanks.
> Léonie.
>
>
> On 05/07/2018 22:02, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
>
>> (Fixing Steve's address. Sorry for the noise.)
>>
>> Hey all.
>>
>> As you may recall, I volunteered to get you test results for HTML-AAM
>> using the ARIA Working Group's in-progress (but working well enough)
>> automated testing tools. That offer still stands. Are you interested?
>>
>> If so, you can find examples of what the tests need to look like in
>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/core-aam. As
>> you'll see there, if the test name starts with "aria-" it's a state or
>> property test. If it starts with a role name, it's a role test. My guess
>> is that you should be able to generate the tests you need automatically
>> by creating a javascript tool to parse your spec and spew out one test
>> file per element or attribute in the table.
>>
>> If you have other plans for testing, let us know and I'll stop with the
>> pinging. :) Otherwise, this approach should help the ARIA WG further
>> sanity check and improve its tools while at the same time quickly
>> getting you a thorough set of results.
>>
>> Take care.
>> --joanie
>>
>>
> --
> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem
>

Received on Thursday, 19 July 2018 09:33:55 UTC