Hi Joanie, really sorry for not responding earlier, i missed the email. Thanks and YES PLEASE, let me know what needs doing from our end. Note I will be on vacation august 2nd-30th. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 10 July 2018 at 18:21, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > + public-html@w3.org > > Thanks Joanie, and sorry for this late reply. It's my understanding that > this testing would be very helpful, but I'll defer to the editors. Steve, > Alexander, Bogdan, and Scott, can you confirm? > > Thanks. > Léonie. > > > On 05/07/2018 22:02, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > >> (Fixing Steve's address. Sorry for the noise.) >> >> Hey all. >> >> As you may recall, I volunteered to get you test results for HTML-AAM >> using the ARIA Working Group's in-progress (but working well enough) >> automated testing tools. That offer still stands. Are you interested? >> >> If so, you can find examples of what the tests need to look like in >> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/core-aam. As >> you'll see there, if the test name starts with "aria-" it's a state or >> property test. If it starts with a role name, it's a role test. My guess >> is that you should be able to generate the tests you need automatically >> by creating a javascript tool to parse your spec and spew out one test >> file per element or attribute in the table. >> >> If you have other plans for testing, let us know and I'll stop with the >> pinging. :) Otherwise, this approach should help the ARIA WG further >> sanity check and improve its tools while at the same time quickly >> getting you a thorough set of results. >> >> Take care. >> --joanie >> >> > -- > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem >
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2018 09:33:55 UTC