Re: Requesting Security IG review of HTML5.2

Hi,

Just one item, and I'm going to open a github issue on it, it's the
proposed keygen removal.  The github issue I'll open will explain why I
think it should not be removed and open that for discussion.

-cg

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Just a quick ping to see whether you had any comments on HTML5.2? If not,
> could someone let us know?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Léonie
> --
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
>
> On 13/04/2017 10:47, Léonie Watson wrote:
>
>> Hello Security IG,
>>
>> Our plan is to begin the process of moving HTML5.2 to CR in early June,
>> per our planned timetable [1]. We'd therefore welcome your review of the
>> current WD [2].
>>
>> To make things manageable the parts of the spec that need review are
>> those noted in the Changes section [3]. We're not expecting the entire spec
>> to be reviewed unless you wish to do so.
>>
>> Please file issues on Github, with a reference to the Security IG in the
>> comment [4]. If you could also send a message here when your review is
>> complete, that would be helpful.
>>
>> We'd be glad of your input as soon as possible, but our cut-off for
>> making CR would be 26th May.
>>
>> Any questions, you know where to find us.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Léonie
>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2016Nov/0014.html
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-html52-20170406/
>> [3] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-html52-20170406/changes.html#changes
>> [4] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/
>>
>
>