On 24 June 2015 at 10:05, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > Assuming the split is fine, should we start publishing split parts now or > is it better to wait for the group's reorganisation? > sooner rather than later > > Should the first batch of documents be published as one big set? It has > big advantages when it comes to linking; but it's a solid chunk of work. > good linking good, bad linking bad > > I'm assuming we'd put all documents under Process 2014 and > auto-publication? > + infinity > > The split documents are currently all listed as being without editors. > Would it be acceptable to take the current list of editors as "Former > Editors"? Any takers for specific documents? > I would like to edit http://darobin.github.io/breakup/specs/html-structure/ http://darobin.github.io/breakup/specs/html-images/ http://darobin.github.io/breakup/specs/html-aria-integration/ -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2015 09:16:20 UTC