- From: Sean Hogan <shogun70@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:44:36 +1100
- To: Eihab Ibrahim <eihabibrahim@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Eihab, Are you saying that if I had posted this on, say, the 2nd April then you would have given it proper consideration instead of just responding to the Subject: line? regards, Sean On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Eihab Ibrahim <eihabibrahim@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > It's a bit too early in the US for April fools' jokes, and I do not think this is an appropriate platform for it. > > Respectfully, > > Eihab > > On Mar 31, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@gmail.com> wrote: > > HTML framesets were the original single-page-application. > > Despite the flaws (mostly not being content-first), at least servers > were emitting reasonably simple HTML including real hyperlinks and > forms. > > What would framesets be like if we designed them today? > > In the linked video I make the case for a successor to framesets. > It is 25 minutes but that is unavoidable. > > https://youtu.be/qVdAc8_ppao > > The first half illustrates *why* this is important / better than alternatives, > with actual demonstrations (which you should try for yourself to > ensure I'm not cheating). > > The second half provides some insight into how I've approached this, > again with demonstrations. > > I'll continue later with details of the differences / enhancements > required to make the frameset concept live up to today's expectations. > > regards, > Sean > >
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 05:45:03 UTC