Re: Draft [URL] reference update to informative text

On 10/07/2014 10:49 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Your text includes the following:
>
>     Most of the URL-related used in the HTML specification
>
> I feel this is missing a word or two.  Maybe "Most of the URL-related
> terms used in the HTML specification" ?

Fixed.  Thanks!

- Sam Ruby

> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net
> <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote:
>
>     Based on feedback that the informative text preceding the [URL]
>     reference is incomplete, and that the informative text following the
>     [URL] reference is no longer accurate, the HTML WG chairs were tasked
>     with proposing a replacement.  We worked with W3C Management and staff,
>     and in particular want to thank Robin for his work on this effort.
>
>     The results can be found here:
>
>     http://dev.w3.org/html5/2014/__10/url-ref.html
>     <http://dev.w3.org/html5/2014/10/url-ref.html>
>
>     Note: At this point in the process, the document is out of the Working
>     Group's hands, but we can make recommendations.  As such
>
>     1) We are looking for technical feedback on the proposed informative
>     text.
>
>     2) All other feedback should be sent to W3C Management, ideally through
>     your Advisory Council representative if you have one.
>
>     - Sam Ruby
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 04:07:42 UTC