- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:49:54 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 02:50:22 UTC
Your text includes the following: Most of the URL-related used in the HTML specification I feel this is missing a word or two. Maybe "Most of the URL-related terms used in the HTML specification" ? On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Based on feedback that the informative text preceding the [URL] > reference is incomplete, and that the informative text following the > [URL] reference is no longer accurate, the HTML WG chairs were tasked > with proposing a replacement. We worked with W3C Management and staff, > and in particular want to thank Robin for his work on this effort. > > The results can be found here: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/2014/10/url-ref.html > > Note: At this point in the process, the document is out of the Working > Group's hands, but we can make recommendations. As such > > 1) We are looking for technical feedback on the proposed informative text. > > 2) All other feedback should be sent to W3C Management, ideally through > your Advisory Council representative if you have one. > > - Sam Ruby > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 02:50:22 UTC