RE: suggestion for tag set <sarcasm> </sarcasm> pair

Steve Faulkner wrote:

“Note: the sarcasm element is not an official or unofficial proposal for anything, its just an experiment i put together yesterday to show how custom elements could be used to create, well, a custom <sarcasm> element.”

 

Another way to approach it might be to use EmotionML [1]. For example:

 

<emotion>

   <category name=”sarcasm” value=”1”>

   Work on HTML at the W3C is over.

</emotion>

 

A quick look at the defined EmotionML vocabularies shows that sarcasm isn’t included [2]. It would be possible to define a vocabulary that included it of course.

 

Léonie.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/emotionml/#s2.5.1

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/emotion-voc/  

 

 

-- 

Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG

@LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup