On 4 November 2014 08:16, Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi> wrote: > there is no such benefit, since CSS is expressive enough. The addition of role/label was at the request of a friend for whom CSS was not expressive. (I’m not sure whether role=note is an adequate example here. It indicates > “A section whose content is parenthetic or ancillary to the main content of > the resource.” I don’t think that’s accurate for a sarcastic remark in > general, and I don’t see what it would benefit. Regarding @aria-label, as > far as I can see, it is mainly intended for text that acts a label for a > control-like element that otherwise lacks a textual label. The @title > attribute is more widely supported, but using it is somewhat illogical too. > And if you really want that everyone surely gets the idea that a remark is > sarcastic, you should precede it with “Sarcasm:” in the real—not > generated—content, or maybe follow it with “(The preceding remark was > sarcastic.)”.) > sure, if you can think of a better way to express the semantics I urge you to do any of the following: 1. file issues https://github.com/stevefaulkner/5-sarcasm/issues 2. fork and change , submit pull requests if desired. 3. create an alternative sarcasm design pattern in some form *May a million semantic constructs bloom!* -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 09:27:29 UTC