W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Updated index of all HTML elements

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:11:53 +0300
Message-ID: <5339DA19.30301@kolumbus.fi>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
2014-03-31 22:23, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
> On 31 March 2014 19:22, Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi 
> <mailto:jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>> wrote:
>
>     If you include it, why not HTML 3.0? It might have had more
>     influence: it was never implemented,
>
>
> not exactly true:
>
> Lynx recognizes the HTML 3.0 
> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/Contents.html> BANNER container element
> Lynx implements the HTML 3.0 
> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/Contents.html> FN element
> Lynx implements the HTML 3.0 
> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/Contents.html> NOTE element
> Lynx also recognizes the HTML 3.0 
> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/Contents.html> FIG and OVERLAY elements
> + the HTML 3.0 <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/Contents.html> FIG, 
> CAPTION and CREDIT elements

I used to be big fan of Lynx, and I still use is occasionally. But it is 
really, and it always was, a niche browser. Moreover, implementing a few 
tags here and there does not mean implementing a language version.

-- 
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 21:12:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:38 UTC