Re: Do not remove the media attribute from the source element

>> Are you saying that all these browsers support @media on <video> and do
the right thing?
The desktop browsers, yes, and those mobile devices that I have been able
to test on (slightly less than the list I gave earlier) yes.

I will write to caniuse.com as mentioned.

That use case mentioned in the bug report alone is a very good reason to
keep the media attribute.


On 12 February 2014 09:34, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com> wrote:
> > For info., I ran some quick tests to see what browsers currently support
> the
> > media attribute as part of <source>:
> > Latest versions of: Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari (5.1 on Windows and 6,
> > 6.1 and 7 on Mac).
> > IE9, IE10, and IE11.
> > Default browsers on all iPad and iPhone variants.
> > Default browsers on Android: SIII, Tab 2, Note II, and Nexus.
>
> Are you saying that all these browsers support @media on <video> and
> do the right thing?
> If so, then it should indeed remain in the spec according to
> cross-browser compatibility rules for features in the spec. After all:
> the spec is there to describe what features are available in browsers.
> At least it would need to be in HTML5.0. If all browsers decided to
> remove it, it would then be deprecated for HTML5.1.
>
>
> > As a side note, I also noticed that the popular caniuse.com website
> makes no
> > mention of the 'media' attribute at all, which wouldn't have helped with
> > people knowing about its existence.
>
> It would be worth talking to them about it.
>
> Also, if you have more indication that this feature actually has a
> good use case and that people will make use of it, it thus it doesn't
> fail the "Real Problems" test [1], that would help make a better case.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#solve-real-problems
>
> I saw https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19619#c36 so
> that's encouraging. Are there any other examples?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>