- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:40:37 +0100
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "Tobie Langel" <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Ben Peters" <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>, public-editing-tf <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:39:47 +0100, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> What is your counter-proposal? > > > Heh. > > Fair enough, I guess. :) > > These seem related to what Java calls semantic events [JAVADOC], so I'd > give that a try to see if it fits the model. If not, would "abstract > events" or simply "high-level events" work? Sorry if these have already > been discussed and dismissed (haven't had much time to look through the > archives, tbh). How about "device-independent events"? -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 13:41:13 UTC