- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:21:44 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 17/09/2013 15:46, Reinier Kaper wrote: > If you want to show a user a path (i.e. "you came here by visiting this > page, then this one and then this one"), then there's no hierarchy, as > it's a dynamic path (read: the path could be anything and is dependant > on the user's action). What if I, as an author, see a breadcramb as the shortest possible absolute path from the homepage to where I am now? Not interested in conveying the hierarchy, just the steps along the way? Then I'd mark it up as an ordered flat list. > Technically yes, but then it would be a path and it would not reflect a > structure (rather a user's actions). I guess it depends on what you want > to show, either the structure, or how a user got somewhere. Or whether you think breadcrumbs must, by definition, also show the hierarchical structure. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 15:22:04 UTC