- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:13:03 +0100
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vna0--y0wXJeQ3s+E5uTOeKt=q__JZdTzmK=cUk8A7Edg@mail.gmail.com>
I have updated the advice on marking up breadcrumb navigation: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/common-idioms.html#rel-up review and feedback welcome. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 26 January 2013 17:00, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Section 4.13.1 Bread crumb navigation (under Common idioms without > dedicated elements [1]) > > encourages the use of the right angle bracket to indicate a > breadcrumb navigation trail: > > <p> > <a href="/">Main</a> > > <a href="/products/">Products</a> > > <a href="/products/dishwashers/">Dishwashers</a> > > <a>Second hand</a> > </p> > > The use of > in this context does not appear to be a good practice to > promote as the angle bracket is a symbol that depending on user agent > (AT in this case) is typically announced as "greater" or not announced > in this context. Either way it is not clearly convyed that its a > breadcrumb trail. > > > It may be that this is not an issue for users who consume the angle > brackets in this context and the pattern of its use conveys that it is > a breadcrumb trail. If it is a problem I suggest that this example > would need to be revisited to see if we can come up with something > that is more useful to a wider range of users. > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/common-idioms.html#common-idioms > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner >
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 09:14:15 UTC