- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:29:35 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5265728F.5010902@kosek.cz>
On 17.10.2013 10:50, Smylers wrote: > But for an author just wanting to create a library and start using it, > without having to perform any admin steps at all such as registering it, > it's better for their attributes to be safely within data-* than > polluting the global attribute namespace, and the spec should continue > to advise that. > > And even for authors who would be willing to register, it should be > pointed out that this isn't necessary if nothing other than your own > library will ever be using the attributes. That sounds reasonable. Am I right that we seem to agree that: 1. data-* attributes should be encouraged for inpage scripts and Javascript libraries who are not yet widely recognized 2. prefix-* attributes should be encouraged when other tools then just Javascript code is using attributes or when such attributes are used by widely deployed Javascript library (like AngularJS) 3. Each prefix-* should be registered by some lightweight process (e.g. Wiki page) -- What about prefixes defined solely in Web Componets? 4. For each registered prefix-* there should be available either applicable specification, or documentation or it should have behaviour defined using Web Components. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 18:30:13 UTC