Re: [RESEND] suggestion: modify <small> definition

On 21/05/2013 14:26, Steve Faulkner wrote:
> fair enough, so how about the following
>
> "The small element represents de-emphasised content"

That actually works for me, though I fear it will be the start of a 
lengthy meta-discussion (which, well, I already engaged in in my last 
two messages).

> On the topic of users who don't get the effect of smaller text:
>
> To my knowledge <small> is the same as <span> for screen reader users,
> so in a sense they are advantaged as the visual de-emphasis is not apparent

Sounds discriminatory to me ;)

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 13:53:04 UTC