W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [RESEND] suggestion: modify <small> definition

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:52:34 +0100
Message-ID: <519B7C22.8080903@splintered.co.uk>
To: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On 21/05/2013 14:26, Steve Faulkner wrote:
> fair enough, so how about the following
>
> "The small element represents de-emphasised content"

That actually works for me, though I fear it will be the start of a 
lengthy meta-discussion (which, well, I already engaged in in my last 
two messages).

> On the topic of users who don't get the effect of smaller text:
>
> To my knowledge <small> is the same as <span> for screen reader users,
> so in a sense they are advantaged as the visual de-emphasis is not apparent

Sounds discriminatory to me ;)

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 13:53:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:02 UTC