W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Google and MPEG LA Announce Agreement Covering VP8 Video Format

From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
Date: 9 Mar 2013 10:04:19 +0100
Message-ID: <513AFB13.9060503@ping.de>
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby:
> I would suggest informally evaluating whether
> or not such a change could conceivably meet the defined exit criteria[1]
> in the time frame specified before proceeding.
> ...
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/public-permissive-exit-criteria.html

I notice this:

"there must be at least two independent, interoperable implementations
of each feature"

and this:


Each implementation must be developed by a different party and cannot
share, reuse, or derive from code used by another qualifying
implementation. Sections of code that have no bearing on the
implementation of this specification are exempt from this requirement."

Does this really imply that using the same VP8 libraries in two
different browsers would make them dependent implementations regarding
that feature?

Received on Saturday, 9 March 2013 10:44:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:32 UTC