- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:26:35 -0500
- To: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/08/2013 05:10 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Steve Faulkner > <faulkner.steve@gmail.com <mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Does this mean we should revisit the requirement for a > supported video format in HTML? > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130307006192/en/Google-MPEG-LA-Announce-Agreement-Covering-VP8 > > I support a move towards specifying VP8 as the baseline video codec for > HTML. Just so we are clear, what you are proposing is doing this in which version of HTML? Prior history on this: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/7 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0286.html I don't believe that this issue needs to be reopened if you are talking about 5.1, but would be if we are talking about 5.0. Either way (5.0 or 5.1), I would suggest informally evaluating whether or not such a change could conceivably meet the defined exit criteria[1] in the time frame specified before proceeding. - Sam Ruby [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/public-permissive-exit-criteria.html
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 22:27:10 UTC