- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:56:12 -0700
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 16:57:04 UTC
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > > Does this mean we should revisit the requirement for a supported video > format in HTML? > > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130307006192/en/Google-MPEG-LA-Announce-Agreement-Covering-VP8 IANAL, but I don't think so. (1) this is an agreement with Google, not with W3C or the Web Community; (2) this does not mean other entities will not have to negotiate an independent license with the same IPR holders. On the other hand, if Google were to grant a sub-license to the W3C and the Web Community that meets the W3C PP, then that might be sufficient cause to re-open this issue. G.
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 16:57:04 UTC