- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:53:32 +1100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHp8n2nXDQSVk1FncbC8CcgTYUgwz5ud+QYVWHLKfrtu_9O6pw@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, the final work was basically David's and mine. Silvia. On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 03/06/2013 02:59 PM, David Singer wrote: > >> Yes, the roll-up proposals on the Wiki from which the latest roll-up >> proposal was derived by Silvia was all my own work. >> > > Good enough for me. > > - Sam Ruby > > On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:58 , Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com >> <mailto:mjs@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com >>> <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.**com <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>> wrote: >>> >>> >I believe in this case, the actual contributors to this proposal are >>>> members of the HTML WG. >>>> That is the rub. You believe this but what about others? I am >>>> certainly willing to be convinced but where is the evidence? >>>> Without firm evidence to this point, I was hoping the easiest way to >>>> do this would be to simply have a FSA to reference. >>>> >>>> >>> From what I can tell from revision history, all the text content for >>> the proposal was written by either Silvia Pfeiffer or David Singer >>> (mostly Silvia). They can tell you if they had any contributions from >>> outside Apple or Google. If we received this proposal with the same >>> authors and without any mention of the CG, we wouldn't be worrying >>> about it. >>> >>> Note that agreeing to an FSA is completely optional for everyone in >>> the CG so it will not flush out any secret contributors, if you think >>> there are any. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Maciej >>> >>> >> David Singer >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 21:54:21 UTC