- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:48:48 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 07/06/2013 10:05, Steve Faulkner wrote: > hixie made a change to the whatwg spec in regards to <small>[1] > > <p>The <code>small</code> element must not be used for subheadings; for > that purpose, use the <code>hgroup</code> element.</p> [...] > but we need to decide if the "must not" requirement on use of <small> is > an appropriate conformance requirement for HTML? What if, as an author, I *do* want to mark my subheading with <small> because I believe that part of the heading should be naturally de-emphasised? What if it was mandated that you "must not" use <small> for subheadings...is there any reliable programmatic way to flag that up as a validation error? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 09:49:16 UTC