- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:12:20 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 04:13:08 UTC
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote: > Let me be crystal clear. I would be delighted if this specification > figured out how to create an open and inter-operable DRM ecosystem that > was simple to implement, that was fair to content creators and viewers > alike, and that would work across all browsers on all platforms. Really, > I would. > You appear to misunderstand the scope/goals of the EME spec. Defining "an open and inter-operable DRM ecosystem" is not in scope. The EME abstract [1] makes this clear, so it is clear that you start your comments based on a false assumption. The issue of content key protection is also clearly marked out of scope [2], so your comments on protection of key secrets are similarly based on a false assumption. I'd suggest you carefully reread the abstract and other statements in EME that clearly delineate the scope of this spec, and reformulate your comments accordingly. Regards, Glenn [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#faq-protection
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 04:13:08 UTC