- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:23:29 -0500
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 1/22/13 5:17 PM, Clarke Stevens wrote: > 2. While rejecting the proposed solution might make a principled > statement, it is unlikely (IMO) to lead to the desired outcome of content > being distributed without restriction. I think this is a gross mischaracterization of the desired outcome for many of us. The desired outcome for me is a specification that can actually be interoperably implemented by any implementor who wishes to do so, like other W3C specifications. What we have so far is a specification that would require some sort of out-of-band agreement on various things to be implementable interoperably. That is to say, I think this is a use case worth addressing, but I don't think the current approach does much for interoperability, since it still requires various private agreements to actually achieve it. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 22:23:57 UTC