- From: Andrew Herrington <a.d.herrington@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:46:05 +0100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B3DFD208-F979-459E-AB33-C75954605438@gmail.com>
Hi Steve, I think my query wasn't clear. I generally support the change in the spec but I don't understand why we're requiring the attribution (if there is one) inside the block quote to be inside a footer element (see bolded part below) "Attribution for the quotation, may be be placed inside the blockquote element, but must be inside a footer element" Point 2 on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Aug/0100.html seems to back the assumption that most people use the pattern: <blockquote> Blah blah <cite><a href=”http://example.com/foo”>A person</a></cite> </blockquote> rather than: <blockquote> Blah blah <footer><cite><a href=”http://example.com/foo”>A person</a></cite><footer> </blockquote> I think footer should still be allowed (for anything that doesn't fit inside a cite element) but I think we should allow the first pattern as people are using it and it has semantic value. KInd regards, Andrew On 29 Aug 2013, at 10:21, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > >Apologies if I missed this but what is the reason for requiring the citation to be in a footer > > its not a requirement, > its a relaxing of current requirements to allow for a common use, while providing a way to indicate "this is metadata about the quote" > > suggest reading- > > new (proposed): http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element > > old: http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element > > change based on: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996 (note: am not closing bug as this discussion has some time to run yet) > http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/on-citing-quotations-again/ > http://oli.jp/2011/blockquote/ > http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Aug/0100.html and related > > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 > > > On 29 August 2013 10:15, Andrew Herrington <a.d.herrington@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies if I missed this but what is the reason for requiring the citation to be in a footer within the blockquote? Is this in case the quote itself contains a citation? > > > Thanks! > > Andrew > > > On 29 Aug 2013, at 09:55, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> some details: >> >> new (proposed): http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element >> >> old: http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element >> >> change based on: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996 (note: am not closing bug as this discussion has some time to run yet) >> http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/on-citing-quotations-again/ >> http://oli.jp/2011/blockquote/ >> http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Aug/0100.html and related >> question: >> >> Is the change backwards compatible? i.e. does it break anything? >> data appears to show that metadata about a quote inside blockquote element is common >> ”inside blockquote” was used 57% of the time, while >> “outside blockquote” was used 43% of the time. >> source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Aug/0100.html >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 >> >> >> On 29 August 2013 07:53, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have made a change in the HTML 5.1 editors draft to allow citations to be included in a footer element within a blockquote element. >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element >> >> >> review and comment welcome! >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 >> > >
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 09:46:35 UTC