- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:08:55 +0300
- To: public-html@w3.org
2013-08-25 19:59, Steve Faulkner wrote: > I am looking at tightening the definition up, to cover its only > typical usage, which includes denoting names in reference to quoted text. Why? This will be just someone's interpretation of typical usage, and if it actually tightens up something to a relevant degree, it will declare much of actual usage (the part you did not classify as typical) as invalid. What's the point? Does anyone gain anything? -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Sunday, 25 August 2013 17:09:18 UTC